Atheists and evolutionists would love to do nothing more than find a “home run” to prove that we live on an “old earth.”  By this we mean that evolutionists claim that our “old earth” is billions of years old.  But the Holy Bible states that we inhabit a “young earth” just thousands of years old.  Along with this “home run” would come no need for God or the Holy Bible.

Alas, there is no such thing as a home run for the atheists and evolutionists, so they must try to build their case piece by piece, like trying to score runs one base hit at a time  They must do this partly by using evidence to state that the earth and the moon are both billions of years old.  This article will look at a geologic and physical phenomenon that will show that the moon is much younger than evolutionary scientists have been teaching us.


Sometimes, findings that scientists discover actually help to point to a young universe.  One such example is the recent geologic findings on the moon.

AOL reports that there is geologic activity on the moon and that it is shrinking a little, caused by internal cooling of the moon1. In fact, Thomas Watters, a planetary geologist at the Center for Earth and Planetary Studies of the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C. said, “These faults could be so young that they may be indicating very, very recent tectonic and, therefore, geologic activity on the moon. One of the general conceptions out there is that the moon is this geologically dead body, and that’s really not the case.”

These small faults on the moon, according to Watters, are found all over the moon.  The discovery was made by a series of scientific studies, including a series of images that were sent by NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (or LRO).

“We know it’s shrinking by looking at these landforms called lobate scarps that kind of look like stair steps in the landscape,” Watters is quoted as saying in the article. “They’re caused by thrust faults, which are generated when the lunar crust material is pushed together and pushed up, forming a cliff or scarp.”

The Apollo 15, 16 and 17 missions discovered small scarps around the equator of the moon2. But findings recently published in Watters’ journal state that 14 scarps have been discovered all over the moon. In fact, seven of these scarps were in the lunar poles.  This indicates that this geologic activity is not a local event, but a global one.

When you look at this information from a Biblical viewpoint, it is startling to think that a satellite that is supposedly billions of years old is still cooling down so as to cause this activity.  Wouldn’t a body like the moon have cooled down by now, unless it is actually a few thousand years old, and not billions of years old?

A second interesting geologic finding involves transient lunar phenomena, or TLPs.  TLPs are short lived local color changes, glowing clouds, bright spots, streaks of light, hazes and mists3. Since the 1600s, over 1,000 TLP events have been reported3.  In the 1880’s, astronomer William Herschel wrote, “I perceived in the dark part of the Moon a luminous spot. It had the appearance of a red star.”  Four years later Herschel wrote, “I perceive three volcanoes …  The third shows signs of an actual eruption of fire, or luminous matter.

The moon has long been assumed by scientists to be very old, but other evidence discovered on the Apollo 15 mission suggests otherwise.  During this mission a high amount of radon-222 was discovered, which only has a half-life of less than four days2.  This gas is a product of radioactive decay, and indicates that there was a recent discharge from within the moon.  Also found during Apollo missions were high readings of heat flow, which would contradict a cold crust on a billion year old moon.  Certainly this shows that there is still plenty of geologic activity on a still young moon.


Another fascinating property of the moon that would point to its young age is the fact of a receding moon.

The moon, in its orbit of earth, is actually moving away from the earth very slowly.  It is estimated that the moon moves away from the earth up to 1 1/2 inches per year.  That may seem like a lot to us, but when you compare inches to light years, it is almost nothing.

But if the moon has been receding at that rate over it existence,  just one billion years ago, it would have been touching the earth.  And our earth is supposed to be over four billion years old, so that couldn’t possibly be the case.  In fact, an age of around 6000 years actually fits in much better for the age of our universe.

Another fact of physical law is the problem of the Earth’s Roche Limit4.  Edouard Roche was a French astronomer who studied the effects of gravity on moons.  In 1849, he was able to mathematically prove that a moon would break up into pieces if it got too close to the planet around which it revolved.  This breakup happens because the gravitational pull of the planet is greater than the moon’s, and the planet’s gravity pull is stronger  on the near side of the moon than the far side.  The rings of Saturn are a possible real-life example of a body, or bodies, which was broken up when it encroached on Saturn’s Roche Limit.

The Earth’s Roche Limit has been measured at being 11,500 miles from the center of our planet.  Since the moon is nearly 250,000 miles from our Earth’s center, it is at a distance over 20 times outside of becoming Earth’s rings.  But if the Earth and moon are over four billion years old, and the moon would have been in close contact with the Earth just one billion  years ago, then the moon would have actually broken up since it would have been inside Earth’s Roche Limit.  Therefore, an old age for the moon is a hard, if not impossible, pill to swallow.

Finally, the earth-moon tidal friction is actually causing the earth’s rotation to slow down6.  Lord Kelvin used that changing spin rate, assumed an initial molten earth, and proved that the earth could not be a billion years old, or the earth’s present shape would be different.


There is evidence from the world of science from the field of geology that the moon, once thought old and dead, is vibrant and alive, and much younger than earlier believed.  Scientific evidence from the 17th, 19th, 20th and 21st centuries actually give evidence that the moon is likely geologically young.  In addition, the laws of physical science undeniably prove that the moon could not be billions of years old, as taught in textbooks, articles and documentaries. 

Yes, the evidence seems to point to a young earth.  And the Bible has been right about that for thousands of years.




3-Our Created Moon by Don DeYoung and John Whitcomb (Master Books, 2000) Question 28, What are transient lunar phenomena? Pp 48-49


5-Our Created Moon by Don DeYoung and John Whitcomb (Master Books, 2000) Question 19, What is the Roche Limit? Pp 48-49



20 Responses to “A Young Moon…”

  1. June 14, 2013 at 1:20 pm

    Hello there, I found your web site by way of Google whilst looking for a related subject,
    your website got here up, it appears good. I’ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
    Hello there, simply changed into alert to your blog via Google, and found that it is really informative. I’m gonna be careful for brussels.
    I will appreciate in case you proceed this in future.

    Many other people will likely be benefited from your
    writing. Cheers!

  2. June 27, 2013 at 10:12 am

    Do you mind if I quote a few of your articles
    as long as I provide credit and sources back to your weblog?
    My blog is in the very same niche as yours and my visitors would definitely benefit from a lot of the information you
    present here. Please let me know if this alright with you.

    Many thanks!

  3. 3 jrobbiep
    June 29, 2013 at 10:12 pm

    Please feel free to quote any articles you wish with the proper credit… Thank you for your interest. Do you have a website?

  4. July 23, 2013 at 11:49 am

    It’s an remarkable paragraph designed for all the web people; they will obtain advantage from it I am sure.

  5. July 23, 2013 at 12:10 pm

    Fantastic goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you are just extremely fantastic. I actually like what you’ve acquired here, really like what you are stating and the way in which you say it.

    You make it enjoyable and you still care for to keep it
    wise. I cant wait to read far more from you. This is really a great website.

  6. July 23, 2013 at 6:49 pm

    Just desire to say your article is as surprising.
    The clarity in your put up is just cool and that i could suppose you’re an expert on this subject. Well with your permission let me to snatch your RSS feed to stay updated with forthcoming post. Thanks 1,000,000 and please continue the rewarding work.

  7. August 3, 2013 at 2:14 am

    Wow, wonderful blog layout! How long have you been running a blog for?
    you make running a blog look easy. The whole look of your web site is great, let alone the content!

    • 8 jrobbiep
      August 3, 2013 at 10:45 am

      I’ve been running this blog for a few years. I can’t take a whole lot of credit for the layout, because WordPress makes the layout SO easy to do. It is literally point-and-click! The content comes from years of reading and studying the subject. Thank you for your kind comments. I hope the blog is a blessing!

  8. September 14, 2013 at 4:12 am

    Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wished to say
    that I have really enjoyed surfing around your blog
    posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again very soon!

  9. September 25, 2013 at 2:04 am

    We stumbled over here different page and thought I should check things out.
    I like what I see so now i’m following you.
    Look forward to exploring your web page repeatedly.

  10. November 28, 2013 at 6:02 pm

    Very good site you have here but I was wondering if you knew of any discussion
    boards that cover the same topics discussed here? I’d really
    love to be a part of group where I can get advice from other experienced individuals that
    share the same interest. If you have any suggestions, please let me know.
    Thank you!

  11. 12 The Devil. Just kidding, I just have logic.
    December 19, 2013 at 10:30 pm

    Stumbled on this while looking for REAL information, but I found this. I was so fascinated by how ignorant of facts and logic this article is, that it kind of disgusted me, and I figured I’d help you out.

    There is a lot of speculatory nonsense in this article. The moon isn’t and has never been thought of as dead in ANY scientific circle. It has no atmosphere, and therefore no air, so erosion by wind is not possible in the same way it is on Earth. The same goes for water, as there isn’t any on the moon. So the surface stays static, bar any changes from external sources, giving the appearance of it being unchanged (“dead”). EVERY body in space, or near enough that it makes no difference, has inner workings. The fact that it is cooling means that it had something inside of it that kept it from cooling for a very long time that could have burned out. Considering the sheer volume, burning all that would take a VERY long time.

    If this is too long and you didn’t read it, you’re just as ignorant as the article makes you sound.

    I know you’ll probably delete this comment because “faithful” people tend to cover up or ignore anything that refutes their belief, no matter how logical and airtight the argument is, usually citing the old “Science is Satan’s work” or “you cannot prove faith wrong”. Both of those are wrong, and so are you. Not trying to knock your beliefs, but keep them where they belong, and never apply them to science, as it has been proven beyond a doubt that the Earth is definitely older than a few thousand years. We homo sapiens have been around longer than that alone. Thank you, and have a great night.

  12. June 7, 2014 at 2:52 pm

    I have bookmarked this site and plan to read it eventually.
    It looks really interesting.

  13. August 20, 2014 at 2:00 am

    Great information. Lucky me I ran across your website by accident
    (stumbleupon). I’ve bookmarked it for later!

  14. August 29, 2014 at 12:08 pm

    excellent post, very informative. I’m wondering why the opposite experts of this sector do not understand this.
    You should continue your writing. I am sure, you have a huge readers’ base already!

  15. September 23, 2014 at 7:04 am

    Very useful. Thanks Alyson!

  16. September 23, 2014 at 12:44 pm

    Hello! I’m at work browsing your blog from my new iphone!

    Just wanted to say I love reading your blog and look forward to all your posts!
    Keep up the great work!

  17. 18 Dan Prince
    September 7, 2015 at 10:43 am

    Many many years ago. I had heard that when man first stepped onto the moon, on July 20th, I believe. That just prior to landing there craft, NASA was very anxious because the pilot flying the craft was not landing promptly. As they were dangerously close to burning needed fule to blast off and escape the moons gravity. The reason given for the delay in landing was that they had this idea that the moon was millions of years old and that with the predicted dust buildup they were worried about sinking in to deep when landing. He kept flying looking for a hard landing site.

    Have you heard anything on this line of thinking. Obviously the dust was only centimeters deep as we saw from pictures of there footprints. Thus suggesting a young moon as apposed to an old moon with feared feet o on dust. I thought this may be another piece against an old moon to include? Or was I mistaken in what I heard years ago?

  18. May 18, 2017 at 5:30 pm

    It’s going to be ending of mine day, but before finish I am reading this enormous paragraph to improve my experience.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog Stats

  • 19,299 hits
July 2019
« Dec    

%d bloggers like this: